Wikia

Wikia Developers Wiki

Cqm

Admin
1,134 Edits since joining this wiki
April 13, 2012
If you have any questions that do not require my specific attention, please consider asking in forums first.
Unless requested, any messages posted here will be replied to here in order to keep a centralised, easy to follow discussion.

Thanks

Thank you for the code formatting, and to answer the question... I have no idea how it worked but it just did. User:Shining-Armor

No problem. All I really did was run it through jshint and fixed the errors that came up there. cqm 14:21, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Whenever I run code through Jslint it gives me errors that do not make sense. like saying $ in $.get is defined before use. User:Shining-Armor
It's because the jQuery object, $, isn't standard javascript. jQuery is a (popular, high use) library that is ported with MediaWiki. There's a checkbox below the code input area labelled something like "Assume jQuery" that'll fix that. You can just ignore those errors if you want through. It'll do the same for every use of the mw (mediaWiki) object too. cqm 17:14, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

← [reset indent]  It's more convenient to add the options directly to your JS code as comments. This e.g. will tell jshint to treat jQuery, $ and mediaWiki as globals:

/*jshint jquery:true*/
/*global mediaWiki:true*/

Check the jshint documentation! There are a lot more options. This is the prologue that I copypaste into every new file:

/*jshint jquery:true, browser:true, devel:true, camelcase:true, curly:false, undef:true, bitwise:true, eqeqeq:true, forin:true, immed:true, latedef:true, newcap:true, noarg:true, unused:true, regexp:true, strict:true, trailing:false */
/*global mediaWiki:true*/

The mediaWiki makers recommend jshint too btw. Though their recommended procedure is a little too complicated for most needs. --  pecoes  16:45, May 30, 2013 (UTC) 

Closures

Can you please attempt to explain to me what this does -- why it's necessary to pass global variables into an IIFE? And what's the beginning semicolon for? That's not even in the recommendations and I don't think it looks good. ~Bobogoobo (talk) 05:52, June 22, 2013 (UTC)

I figured that was what the semicolon was for -- an idiocy shield. If something's broken it should be fixed anyway. I guess it's harmless and useful, but then why doesn't every script do it (that's the first time I've seen it) and why isn't it in the coding conventions? As for the closures, obviously $ and mw are undefined in jshint since it's not a page that the script is meant to run on, which always have those defined. The rest is unnecessary because what the heck else on a Wikia page would use those? If Wikia even wanted to use something that would override those, I'm sure they would prevent it, so that they didn't break every single thing that already uses it. But again, harmless and good practice I guess, so...anyway, thanks for the explanations. ~Bobogoobo (talk) 08:22, June 22, 2013 (UTC)

Welcome

Hi, welcome to Wikia Developers Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the User talk:Pecoes page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! Grunny (talk) 09:44, July 22, 2013 (UTC)

Source Tag

The source tag is deprecated? Since when? Where does it say that? --  pecoes  09:01, July 26, 2013 (UTC) 

On the extension documentation itself: mw:Extension:SyntaxHighlight GeSHi. It's not obvious, Special:TagsReport still reports on source tags rather than syntaxhighlight and source tags still work (for backwards compatibility perhaps?). Nonetheless, the extension docs say to use syntaxhighlight as seen in the tags used section of the infobox. cqm 09:16, 26 Jul 2013 (UTC)
Ah. I see. You mean this:
"Before rev:50696, the extension used the tag <source>. This is still supported, but <syntaxhighlight> avoids conflicts if your source code itself contains <source> (for example XML)."
It doesn't say "deprecated" though. It only says that <syntaxhighlight> has less conflict potential. --  pecoes  09:31, July 26, 2013 (UTC) 
Considering the general lack of mention of them I'm inclined to remove them incase they become unsupported at some point in the future. cqm 09:42, 26 Jul 2013 (UTC)
I think you're overinterpreting the word "still" :) --  pecoes  09:49, July 26, 2013 (UTC) 

Creating a new discussion for ajaxRC

I'd submit your changes to AjaxRC at Portal:Code review so it can hopefully be pushed to AjaxRC/code.js by new week. --Kangaroopowah (Talk) 18:55, August 1, 2013 (UTC)

Cheers, will do. cqm 19:46, 1 Aug 2013 (UTC)

Code

Sorry to waist your time, but where did you learn code — OriginalAuthority at Wikia Developers Wiki File:Favicon.ico 17:21, August 10, 2013 (UTC)

I started out with a bit of codeacademy to teach me the basics. I got to the point where I wasn't learning anything particularly useful to me, so started reading through the various scripts on my home wiki. From there I picked a project and learned what I had to make it all work, largely through googling my problem which usually led me to stackoverflow (a truly fantastic resource). I think my earliest fully fledged script was w:c:rs:User:Cqm/adminreport.js. It sstarted out as querying the mediawiki api for the number of wanted files/page/templates/categories, broken and double redirects and unused files. From there I added a way to detect if there were pages in certain categories (page for deletion for example) and then when certain pages were last edited.
Just pick something you want to do, then figure out how to do it. It doesn't need to be an elegant script, as long as it works it serves as a learning exercise. I used HeaderLinks/code.js as an exercise in native js, as I'd largely been using jQuery up until then. If I got stuck I'd just google my problem until I found an answer.
PS. The favicon image in your sig doesn't work. cqm 18:08, 10 Aug 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, I'm actually using codecademy, I've been doing it for a while, I've run into the same problem as you, nothing useful. The sig problem is due to there being no favicon for this wiki, there using an alternative file. — OriginalAuthority at Wikia Developers Wiki File:Favicon.ico 18:22, August 10, 2013 (UTC)

Chat help

Yes well can you come to my wiki Chat i have few quesionsJarjarkine (talk) 00:20, November 22, 2013 (UTC)

Wait you cant edit the wiki cuz youy are not admin..Jarjarkine (talk) 00:23, November 22, 2013 (UTC)

The next iteration for ajaxrc

Hey cam. So this is what I was thinking we could do for the next version of ajaxrc. First, expose the script under either the dev.ajaxrc global or just the global AjaxRC. Secondly, make a way to change ajaxrc configuration through object notation, not individual global variables, while maintaining backwards compatibility with the old version. Finally, I want to see what I can do about submitting a pulls request so we don't need to have a recentchangeslocal variable in the script. Does that sound good to you? I'll probably have the first two done by the end of the first week in January. Best, --Kangaroopowah (Talk) 16:29, December 26, 2013 (UTC)

The global thing seems like the next step in the development of the script. I'd stick with keeping it under the dev global for consistency's sake, perhaps combine it with a version/timestamp to make sure we're using the version imported from dev (if for some reason we can't find the import). As for the config, what about using dev.ajaxrc for the config then extending it using $.extend in the main script.
For the pull request, it could take an extraordinarily long time. github:Wikia/app/pull/1470 has been open 4 months with negligible progress. That's assuming we can even convince wikia to class it as something that requires a fix. I assume you know it needs to enter wikia's bug tracker before a pull request can be opened, let me know if you want any help writing a s:c to argue your case. cqm 00:04, 27 Dec 2013 (UTC)
Two things. Firstly, don't worry about the pull request. Secondly, the way you exposed ajaxrc in cqm/ajaxrc.js is the more verbose (and honestly, a bit more complicated) of the way to do it. The way im planning to do it is to create an nd variable in the closure header as dev.ajaxrc and then initialize it at the bottom of the script with all the methods there in object literal form. --Kangaroopowah (Talk) 03:33, December 28, 2013 (UTC)
Ok so I finished my version of the new config and global object. They're over at /beta.js. The disadvantage to the way I handled the globalness is that it doesn't have "write" capabilities, that is to say modifiying the object's functions from console won't actually change the way the script performs. If we were to change it we would use the way you started coding it in your userspace. You should not however that this is an important design descicion for the script that should be thought about fairly carefully. Lastly about the config, our implementations user-side wise are the same but yours way buggy if dev.ajaxrc existed but only had some config options but not all so I fixed that. Best, Kangaroopowah (Talk) 03:25, December 29, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks :-) Ismael Perez (talkcontribsblog) 18:28, February 16, 2014 (UTC)

Code Editor Permission

I have several scripts on this wiki, and would like to have them protected. However I would also like to still be able to work on them. Do you know how I can get "Code Editor" permissions?

Code Lyoko Wiki: User: Deadcoder 15:19, March 22, 2014 (UTC)

You'll need to request the right on Grunny's talk page. If he think you're competent enough to warrant being enough in the group, he'll grant your request. As a warning, he might take a while to respond to the message so don't expect a reply immediately. cqm 16:39, 22 Mar 2014 (UTC)
Thank you.
Code Lyoko Wiki: User: Deadcoder 20:07, March 22, 2014 (UTC)

ChatTags

Man, why the images of the chat tags are not working? I just tried to fix ...

--Affquesaco (talk) 15:19, March 23, 2014 (UTC)

It was intentionally removed because it was a security risk, not because it was broken. Re-enabling it on a wiki puts every user in chat at risk of malicious scripts. Please leave it removed until that risk has been patched. cqm 15:22, 23 Mar 2014 (UTC)

LESS

Your LESS project is very interesting. I cannot wait to see how it works out. Lil' Miss Rarity ]Open Source[ (talk) 13:20, March 26, 2014 (UTC)

You can take a look at it here if you'd like :)
The main problem is that the js version of less isn't designed to be used the way I need, so I'm working with next to no docs and from a few notes on stackoverflow. Added to all the other projects I'm doing, it's slowly coming along ;) cqm 02:10, 28 Mar 2014 (UTC)

Usertags

Hi do you know where's the code WIKIA use for adding masthead for: Wikia staff, Wikia star, VSTF or ect ? The script they uses i wuold like to see it Please.Emperor Jarjarkine (talk) 14:50, April 5, 2014 (UTC)

Wikia add the tags server side, the code for doing that is spread across at least two files: controller, template. The tags themselves are set elsewhere, likely using a database query, but I couldn't see anything from a quick search. cqm 15:07, 5 Apr 2014 (UTC)

Request

Congratulations on becoming an administrator here. You'll be a great asset to us all.

I was wondering if you could perform the things I requested on Grunny's talk page awhile back. That is if it isn't too much trouble. Lil' Miss Rarity ]Open Source[ (talk) 12:43, April 22, 2014 (UTC)

Both done :) cqm 13:18, 22 Apr 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! Lil' Miss Rarity ]Open Source[ (talk) 13:23, April 22, 2014 (UTC)

ChatTags

Is there any reason that ChatTags/code.js shows up in raw format? I have tried other browsers and I have looked at other code pages and this is the only one that shows up like this. I cannot even edit it. Any help would be appreciated. Lil' Miss Rarity ]Open Source[ (talk) 15:42, April 26, 2014 (UTC)

I've double checked the protection settings, it's fine. I haven't tried editing it, purely because I'm on my phone and don't want to screw anything up accidentally. Is it giving any errors when editing, e.g. permissions? Any errors in your console? I don't quite understand what "raw" means - as if it's not been parsed by geshi? Have you checked in both skins or from multiple devices?
I'll pull out my test account later, if you can give me some pictures of what you're seeing that would be great :) it could be a varnish cache based error, which might be fixed through a null edit. Other than that I don't know what it might be without a more detailed description of the bug and some first hand investigation. cqm 18:57, 26 Apr 2014 (UTC)
It shows up as if I appended ?action=raw to the URL. I cannot edit it, I cannot move it, no history, no anything. It's acting like it's serving a normal JavaScript page. Lil' Miss Rarity ]Open Source[ (talk) 19:00, April 26, 2014 (UTC)
Ok, I'll take a proper look when I get back tonight to see if I can reproduce what you're seeing.
On a side note, please get rid of the font tags in your sig, they were deprecated years ago :P cqm 19:07, 26 Apr 2014 (UTC)
It appears fine to me--~UltimateSupreme 19:21, April 26, 2014 (UTC)

(Reset Indent) This is what I see whenever I try to load the page. Also Cqm, I know they are. I've been meaning to switch them for quite some time now. Lil' Miss Rarity ]Open Source[ (talk) 19:35, April 26, 2014 (UTC)

I do remember something like that happening to me too. Did you try manually appending ?action=edit?--~UltimateSupreme 10:42, April 27, 2014 (UTC)

Re:

I see, okay I'll add it to the JS page on my test wiki. Also, I know how to set it up :P.

Lil' Miss Rarity ]Open Source[ (talk) 12:45, April 28, 2014 (UTC)

Masthea

Yo Cqm ! I just talked to Jr because i have problems with the masthead of my wiki. He tried to fix it but it didn'T work. So i was wondering, as you're a Dev, do you think you can do something ?=http://fr.shingekinokyojin.wikia.com/wiki/MediaWiki:Common.js/masthead.js?action=edit{{SUBST:User:Emperor Jarjarkine/Sig3}} 21:47, April 28, 2014 (UTC)

It's probably throwing errors because of all the empty strings for the Patrouilleurs users. I've made a fresh version here which fixes the script for Special:Contributions/USERNAME with some style changes to make it a bit simpler, as well as fixing the bug. Hopefully it's fairly self explanatory to edit, but let me know if you have any questions. cqm 22:15, 28 Apr 2014 (UTC)

Reorganize List of JavaScript Enhancements

Some of the tabs in the List of JavaScript Enhancements have grown so large that they are hard to look through. Would it be okay if I reorganized the lists so things were easier to find? Code Lyoko Wiki: User: Deadcoder 16:48, May 4, 2014 (UTC)

How exactly would you reorganize them? --Kangaroopowah (Talk) 18:32, May 4, 2014 (UTC)
I think they'd benefit from some automatic updating via dpl or some sort of category intersection extension, but that would require reworking the relevant infoboxes first.
Is there anything in particular you wanted to do? All I can really see is some alphabetisation changes you've made so far. cqm 23:35, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
So far, I have done the alphabetization. I would like a stronger reorganization. What I would probably do is break it into 4 sections on the page:
  • Wiki-wide only, which would be stuff that should only be installed wiki-wide
  • co-installable, which can be installed either way
  • User only, which can only be installed at the user level.
  • None-installable, which would be the dead, beta, or un-maintained scripts.
I would probably add more categories. For example, I would add a dedicated tab to chat extensions, since there are so many of those. I might add one explicitly for file management, since those seem to be numerous as well
Code Lyoko Wiki: User: Deadcoder 04:00, May 7, 2014 (UTC)
I'm not a fan of the 4 sections, purely because you'll have duplicated subcategories under each section making it harder to find things. It might be an idea to add a little icon for scripts that can be installed site-wide. None-installable seems a bit subjective too. For example, ReferencePopups still works afaik, but it's been unmaintained for a long time. I don't know anyone who's willing to mess with Lunarity's codebase either. Similarly ShowHide still works last I heard, but it's been deprecated in favour of mw-collapsible. That's not to say it doesn't work or isn't still perfectly usable - not even enwiki uses mw-collapsible everywhere.
Ideally I'd like to see some work on the infobox and then see the lists updated by dpl. Whilst some users know about the list, other don't and not everyone lists their scripts there. Some of the categories/params we could add the the infobox are:
  • unmaintained
  • beta
  • type - this could be chat, ui customisation, etc. Essentially what we have as the tabs now.
We could add a category to scripts that can be enabled site-wide, user or both, although I can't see how it would fit on the list. Perhaps it should enable a transclusion of {{personal}} instead? Anyway, do you have any thoughts on said infobox changes?
The extra categories, i.e. chat, file management, look good :) cqm 12:58, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
In that case, I will add the additional categories, but I won't divide them into sections. An alternate solution is to have them in categories, and within each category, break them up along those lines. But I won't implement that right now.
Code Lyoko Wiki: User: Deadcoder 15:04, May 7, 2014 (UTC)
I just updated it with those two additional categories. I think it's been a change for the better, but I still think that more improvements are needed.
Code Lyoko Wiki: User: Deadcoder 15:23, May 7, 2014 (UTC)
What do you think of the changes, so far?Code Lyoko Wiki: User: Deadcoder 21:52, May 20, 2014 (UTC)
In truth I'm not a fan of straight lists. Then again, I'm even less of a fan of tabbers. I think both are uninspiring and univiting in terms of UI and don't lend themselves to anything that I would want to interact with.
However, my opinions about the format aside, I do think the extra categories you've added are a definite improvement and something I'd like to implement as actual categories. DPl is enabled now and a bug that was apparently causing some nasty side-effects has been temporarily fixed, so I'm going to have a play around with creating a UI that generates dpl queries on the fly, maybe making use of some parsoid too - I've been wanting to try it out for a while. cqm 23:24, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Personally, I'm not a fan of the tabbing either. The only reason I've kept them so far is that the alternatives were even worse.
I too think DPL would be good for this page; but we will have to do a major overhaul on the categories on this wiki in order for that to be done effectively. If you think my chosen categories would be a good basis for that, let me know, and I will implement them as actual categories. Code Lyoko Wiki: User: Deadcoder 15:18, May 26, 2014 (UTC)

Wikia Nav Problem/Fault

Everytime i add a page link title onto the wikia navigation, it doesn't show up and I need a solution to why the page link title doesn't show up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LiamJaco1998lfc (talkcontribs) 20:55, May 14, 2014

Hi, I'm a little confused what you're asking for help with. Do you meant the wiki navigation that's edited through MediaWiki:Wiki-navigation? If that's the case, you can't edit it without being an admin on the wiki you're editing it on.

Deletion

UserTags/module.prefLanguages.js has a link in the infobox; you probably deleted it by mistake.--~UltimateSupreme 11:17, May 21, 2014 (UTC)

My apologies for that. Not quite sure how I managed to delete that, I must have not noticed being redirected to it somehow. Sorry if I broke something. cqm 19:48, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, redirects do make it confusing
Its probably just something for a project that never finished... so nothing broke.~UltimateSupreme 08:57, May 22, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry Cqm- was looking at the timer talk page but missed your direct note.  I'm new to wikia.

I can run two different countdown timers on a page.  But, they aren't completely independent as they appear to share the same data-end variable.  If I set this flag on the first timer, the second will also end when the first does.  Both timers end up showing the post-countdown text, but the second timer also shows the countdown date instead of continuing to count down.  Example below of the first timer ending causing both timers to end.

Any ideas on how to run two independent countdown timers that can have their data-end trigger independently?



Is there anyway possible to make a drop down table??  I want to make a table filled where i can drop down and select to show only one specific row

Codeeditor

Can you please transfer my codeeditor group from Lil' Miss Rarity to this account? It'd be much appreciated. Shining-Armor (talk) 23:38, July 29, 2014 (UTC)

Could you verify this request with your old account? I have no way to verify it's coming from your new account. cqm 23:42, 29 Jul 2014 (UTC)
Done :) cqm 23:55, 29 Jul 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. Shining-Armor (talk) 23:58, July 29, 2014 (UTC)

LESS i18n

Hello Cqm!

Sure, I'll add the translation, most likely at the end of this week (busy times >_<). Not sure about polish, but I'll definitely provide russian and ukrainian translations. Wild @Wikia 20:16, July 30, 2014 (UTC)

irc chat

the irc chat here is not working,i thought you should know so you could fix,did it ever work in the first place?

Rider ranger47 14:28, August 1, 2014 (UTC)

IRC chat? I'm guessing you don't mean the #wikia-dev channel in freenode, so could you clarify what you mean please? cqm 18:53, 1 Aug 2014 (UTC)
i mean the button on the home page for the wiki
Rider ranger47 21:36, August 14, 2014 (UTC)

Star ratings

Hi, I'm wondering about the StarRatings widget. Is the project completely abandoned, and if so I think it would be better to add a disclaimer to the page indicating that it is so. Also are there any other scripts that can emulate that behaviour,e.g. add vote ability to a block section.

Dessamator (talk) 07:48, August 5, 2014 (UTC)

I think it is more or less, there were some issues with the api that was planning to be used that weren't correctable with javascript. Ideally it would be an extension, but since wikimedia abandoned their ratings extension I doubt anyone's going to take it on. cqm 10:18, 5 Aug 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, I'm just wondering since you have considerable knowledge of the wikia api. Is there any way of storing something in a local wiki database? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dessamator (talkcontribs) 16:09, August 5, 2014
You can't access the wiki's database client side, it's a serious security weakness if you can. You can store data on a page in the same way you'd edit, but that's obviously open to vandalism. It's also nowhere near as fast as straight querying a database.
There is a script on RuneScape, although I don't think it was ever implemented, that aims to create a database. I don't know much about how it works, but it was designed by runescape:User:Yitzi who might be able to give you more information on it. cqm 16:15, 5 Aug 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, apparently their script was basically finished and working, see it here . It merely needed users to understand how it works. Though whether it is very buggy or not only time will tell I guess.
Dessamator (talk) 10:58, August 6, 2014 (UTC)

help with my wiki's common.js file

Hello,i recently added some things to a commom.js file from this wiki,to one of the wikis i help work on,the minecraft nations wiki i have waited 24hrs,and nothing i put in the file has worked,could you look it over and see what i messed up?

Rider ranger47 12:13, August 14, 2014 (UTC)

You had an error where you tried to modify a variable that hadn't been defined yet. I've fixed the error and tidied it all up here. Completely replace w:c:mc-nations:Common.js with that and it should work. I haven't tested it, so let me know if there's any problems with it and I'll take another look :) cqm 16:45, 14 Aug 2014 (UTC)
ok,i put the code in and everything but usertags works 
Rider ranger47 21:48, August 14, 2014 (UTC)
UserTags is incredibly complex to debug and fix, so much so that if it ever breaks I seriously doubt anyone is ever going to step up and fix it. If you'd like I can give you a much simpler script that does the same? cqm 10:03, 15 Aug 2014 (UTC)
if it does the same,sure Rider ranger47 12:36, August 15, 2014 (UTC) 
Well, I can't reproduce the inactivity tags with what I had in mind. Would that be acceptable for you? cqm 12:43, 15 Aug 2014 (UTC)
Thats ok,i have another script for the inactive users,what did you have in mind?
Rider ranger47 14:08, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
And will it have the rest of the features i need?
Rider ranger47 13:20, August 23, 2014 (UTC)
are you still here?
Rider ranger47 20:24, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
Hi, sorry for the delay. I was thinking of manually setting the tags you want to add for the custom tags and then some extra behaviour for adding/merging tags using a small amount of jQuery. The hardcoded tags would be similar to what I've done on rs wiki here (look for the mastheadBoxes function) do you think you;d be able to maintain that type of list? cqm 22:48, 25 Aug 2014 (UTC)

I do not know what jQuery is,i can copy paste the code from that wiki and use it though.

Rider ranger47 21:36, August 26, 2014 (UTC)


How would i use jQuery and where does the code go?

Rider ranger47 22:49, August 26, 2014 (UTC)

And what is the code for it?

Rider ranger4712:33, September 1, 2014 (UTC)

Nav link

I believe that the link under Lua which currently points to Converting Wikitext templates should instead be pointing to Lua templating/Converting Wikitext templates--~UltimateSupreme 15:56, August 22, 2014 (UTC)

page protection request

I recently posted a full scale step by step intructions for the slider that is on the Avatar Wiki - last airbender, could you possibly lock that to prevent others from disrupting those; not many people know how to successfully set it up.

article to lock: http://dev.wikia.com/wiki/Instructions:Slider

delete request: http://dev.wikia.com/wiki/Instructions:_Slider

thanks for your time and consideration, 

Dartmaster8 (talk) 18:03, August 29, 2014 (UTC)

I've deleted the one page per your request, but I haven't locked the other. If I gave it full protection, you wouldn't be able to edit it. The other option is giving it codeeditor protection which we use for code pages here. This requires me to add you to the codeeditor group, but given that the javascript isn't hosted here I don't think it's really required. CSS isn't particularly dangerous and if someone does mess with it there's enough people that frequent this wiki to know what they're looking at. If it makes you feel better, this wiki is already protected from anonymous edits - only logged in users can edit here in the first place so the risk of vandalism isn't particularly high.
I'd advise moving the instruction to "Silder" too. Using a faux namespace isn't something anyone else does currently and I think it's better to go with the status quo than have documentation in inconsistent locations. cqm 23:10, 30 Aug 2014 (UTC)
I think the page at this point in time is done and doubt that further changes will need to be made, locking to sysop is fine as I probably won't need to edit to make any changes. moved the page to "Slider", could you delete the redirect page? Dartmaster8 (talk) 03:19, August 31, 2014 (UTC)
to add on to this, only 5 people know how this works as most people I have asked for help when attempting to create a test version declined to take a look when I got stuck including you - left a message but got no response. I don't care if you gave it full protection, I don't need to change it. Dartmaster8 (talk) 06:56, September 1, 2014 (UTC)
Again, I don't think protecting a documentation page is in any way necessary. Not a single documentation page is currently protected as far as I know. If you find that your page is the target of vandalism I'd happily look at page protection or possibly abuse filters, but currently the rate of vandalism is so low it's non-existent.
As for me declining to help you, I tend to have several projects on at any given time ranging from scripts I host here, scripts I manage and develop on w:c:rs and the voldev programme, which together take up a significant amount of the time I have available to spend online. I don't mind giving occasional support or advice on small things, but I simply don't have the time to given personal support to everyone. cqm 10:12, 1 Sep 2014 (UTC)
alright then Dartmaster8 (talk) 04:15, September 2, 2014 (UTC)

Organizing lua modules

I think we should just follow the pattern already being used successfully by wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lua/Modules

They also have some way of counting how many wikis use a particular template, if that could be implemented here it would be very useful. Though that big list probably contains a lot of useful scripts, the fact that it isn't rated or ranked makes it very hard to find anything. So maybe that's something that should also be considered. If you agree with my suggestion, feel free to move the page to its appropriate namespace. 

Dessamator (talk) 18:54, August 29, 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia use something on wikimedia's toolserver and a bot to update the uses of a template iirc, it's not an extension or an internal script afaik. It's also not very useful to have here. Most of this wiki is essentially a repository for scripts. There's a scattering of official wikia documentation and the third party (as in us) code documentation which seems to be the more predominant page type. We don't actually use any of the scripts other than to showcase them as part of the documentation. It's unlikely we'd ever have much use for the modules either.
There are proposals for things like global gadgets and global modules currently being bounced around mediawiki (have a look at mw:RfC for more details). If those ever come to fruition and are backported to wikia successfully, it's possible dev wiki might become a central repository for scripts and modules which can be used on other wikis, similar to how we can transclude templates from central to here now (although that works differently and isn't very efficient). If the module part of that ever becomes reality then it might be worth having a module/template usage counter (assuming we could access something to do global look ups) but until then anyone who wants to use a module from here needs to manually copy it over and go from there. Considering how scripts have been altered over the years from their origins, it's not unlikely that modules that originated here will be tweaked and upgraded over time so it's not really fair to assume any module on another wiki uses the same code as one on here and even then it might be a simple coincidence that the name matches. cqm 22:47, 1 Sep 2014 (UTC)
That's a good point. So what's the consensus, do we leave the module page as is or move it somewhere else? A the very least the module can serve as something beginners can use to understand or learn to script. Dessamator (talk) 09:43, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
I'd go with having the code for a module in the module ns so it's at the very least testable and then you can use it to demonstrate how it works in a demo if you choose. I think a fairly simple pairing is to have Module:PAGENAME for the module and PAGENAME for the documentation (which is in the mainspace). cqm 09:56, 2 Sep 2014 (UTC)
I've Moved the page to utitlity . There's one thing that is nice in wikipedia though, the Module:PAGENAME/doc, works in the same way as the regular template . Is there any chance it can work that way here? That would make things way simpler.
P.S. Can you delete all the modules I created mistakengly :http://dev.wikia.com/wiki/Module:Utility_Module/Module:UtilityModule:Utility Module/Module:Utility . I might have missed a few so check my contributions if needed.
Can you also add some sort of link to lua modules in the top navigation bar or somewhere. Right now people can only find if there is a lua module if they know about it. Or search through the namespace.Dessamator (talk) 21:42, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
The automatic /doc transclusion would be nice, but unfortunately it's not possible to implement at the moment - "the way they implemented that was using content handler, and was the first change that required MW1.21+" -Grunny (from skype). I'd guess it's on a wishlist somewhere, but it's likely to be a while before it comes to wikia. We should be able to load it with js though.
Ideally we need a category or hub page for our third-party modules like List of JavaScript Enhancements. I am still trying to get around to generating that automatically from infobox parameters using js, but in the mean time I might add a link to Special:PrefixIndex/Module: which will list everything in the module ns for users to look at. Currently there's only a few so hopefully it'll do for the time being.
I deleted the pages for you, thanks for being the guinea pig in all this :) cqm 09:48, 3 Sep 2014 (UTC)
You're welcome. Personally, I would have never touched any serious templates if it weren't for lua, those curly bracket things were the work of an insane person :
Anyway, I've always enjoyed coding with lua, it was a fun language that basically taught me the core of programming before I learned it formally. It is quite interesting to see the things people are creating for it. For now just creating a basic page like  List of JavaScript Enhancements will suffice, I think. Once you do I'll post another strange module. :) Dessamator (talk) 22:06, September 3, 2014 (UTC)

DemoScripts

Hi. Could you import ListUsers/code.js to ListUsers? -- Fubuki風吹 talk 13:18, 09.09.2014

Line/Historical chart

Hi, I recall you mentioned that you were an admin in w:c:Runescape. I was just wondering if you knew which script the historical Line/historical chart is using.Dessamator (talk) 23:30, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I replied on the thread :) cqm 08:20, 19 Sep 2014 (UTC)

Spotlight.js and Adoption.js

Hello Cqm, I'm Rémy from Vietnamese Wikia, I made w:vi:MediaWiki:Adoption.js for Adoption request w:vi:Wikia:Yêu cầu nhận wiki and w:vi:MediaWiki:Spotlight.js for Spotlight request w:vi:Wikia:Yêu cầu nổi bật.

Then I can click on request button, can fill the form, but I can't submit the form, I just click click and click the submit button, but it doesn't work.

I first created Spotlight.js, then I see it works fine, but when I further created Adoption.js, everything goes error.

Please help! Rémy@@Wikia (tườngemail) 00:25, September 30, 2014 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the lack of it being in english is causing me some trouble in figuring our how it's meant to work. Ideally all the translations should be at the top and then be accessed as properties of a messages object later on e.g. var msgs = { en: { some messages here }, fr: { translated messages here }, ... }; It would make the html a lot easier to understand. Having said that, it looks like you've translated from the english version on community wiki, so that's not really your fault.
I recall there being some issues with the adoption script on english community wiki however, I don't know any of the details though. I'd suggest talking to User:Shining-Armor (previously User:Lil' Miss Rarity) who wrote that script. He might be able to compare the two versions of the script and see what's gone wrong. I didn't see any errors when playing around with the script, and I didn't get anything to be concerned about when running it through jshint so I'm unable to be much more help I'm afraid. cqm 08:30, 30 Sep 2014 (UTC)

Deletion

Can you please delete [[QuickProfil]] script, I didn't notice that they are already one like that. Thanks. Gguigui1 (discussion) @Wikia 06:51, October 19, 2014 (UTC)

Done :) cqm 17:07, 19 Oct 2014 (UTC)

Nav with Show/Hide button

Oh that's what I really need...

I need to know how to create a Navigational Tempate box with Show Hide button. Can you please help me?Milkandchocolate (talk) 05:13, November 10, 2014 (UTC)

Help:Collapsing explains how to create collapsible elements with the builtin feature. Arkondi (talk) 08:28, November 10, 2014 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Geshi.css

Would you add an import for MediaWiki:Geshi.css, please? Arkondi (talk) 10:33, January 12, 2015 (UTC)

I'm slightly confused by your request - has it stopped loading on pages with syntaxhighlighting? If so where? cqm 11:48, 14 Jan 2015 (UTC)
Sorry. I took a closer look now and perhaps it's only a namespace specific problem (see Thread:5735). Arkondi (talk) 17:56, January 14, 2015 (UTC)
Looks like yet another quirk of Wall. I've lazy loaded it for now, I'll try to remember to send a bug report in for it when I get time. cqm 22:38, 15 Jan 2015 (UTC)
I thank you. Arkondi (talk) 09:08, January 16, 2015 (UTC)

Syntax Highlighting

Hi Cqm !

I was wondering why the new editor Syntax Highlighting was not enabled on Wikia Developers Wiki. Are you waiting for it to be perfectly stable? Thank you in advance for your answer. —Hulothe @Wikia 15:07, April 8, 2015 (UTC)

It is already enabled here. You should see it working here. The new code editors are meant for site-wide and personal css/js pages; they won't work on mainspace articles where most of the scripts are held. -- sqm | talk | 23:35, 04.08.2015
I hadn't realised it was only enabled for those 2 namespaces to be completely honest, my intention was for it to be used for the mainspace code pages we commonly use here. I'll see if I can sort something out to fix this issue :) cqm 06:41, 9 Apr 2015 (UTC)
Ok, thank you for your answers! —Hulothe @Wikia 15:45, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

Adding a lua forum topic for converting wikitext

Hi, I'd like to suggest that you add a new forum(Board) for conversion of wikitext/wikipedia templates to lua modules/templates. I think this will be much better for organizing the conversion activities. For example, we could simply dump popular wikitext/wikipedia templates there, and let whoever wants to help convert it. 

I used to create lua scripts for ptokax and a sub-forum like that really helped people out when the forum software changed, for example, something like [this].

Dessamator (talk) 11:23, April 12, 2015 (UTC)

Request for code editor rights

Hi Cqm, may I have the code editor rights? I'd like to edit DemoScripts.js amongst other things and feel as though my JavaScript proficiency is at a level to be able to be considered a decent code editor. – Ozuzanna 18:47, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

Update: Sorry I didn't know you had to make a forum for the rights, as Project:Requests for Codeeditor is for that. – Ozuzanna 21:43, May 10, 2015 (UTC)

Countdown end

Hello, I seem to be having a problem with a countdown option on our wiki. Right now, it's fine: (countdown), but when I try to replace the countdown with the replacement option (data-end="toggle" and so on), it works fine when the countdown has ended BUT also loads with the countdown that has yet to end. I'm currently testing it out on my sandbox, where the 'problem' currently lies. Would appreciate the help, thanks! ~ redwall64 10:04, May 17, 2015 (UTC)

Update: so I got it to work but only after playing around with the countdowns. Right now, it works fine (without the words meant to replace the countdown appearing with the countdown) if all the countdowns on the page are still counting down, but when one is finished, the replacement text appears in all the countdowns, regardless of whether or not they're done. My temporary solution for right now is changing the end countdown function for the other countdowns except the one closest to ending, but I was wondering if there was a way to actually fix this? Would appreciate the help. Thanks. ~ redwall64 11:15, May 19, 2015 (UTC)

I suspect this is similar to a previous bug where one timer caused another to end as well. I'll have a look at it when I can to see what's going on. cqm 06:28, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Upon a closer look, you're using the same class for both timers, they're not unique. Changing the class to something else (adding a number to the end is an easy way) should fix the issue. cqm 14:52, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

delete request

could you delete Slider? found a better name so i moved the page

Nerfmaster8 (talk) 20:55, June 10, 2015 (UTC)

View Source

Hi cqm, since no one seemed to be reading the Talk pages here and here of the View Source script, I wondered if you (as an admin) could implement the code change I suggested to fix the "undefined" bug. Or maybe you could lower the protection of the code.js page so other people could contribute to the code? There are some more prominent bugs in the script, including the slash symbol that is gone. Since this script is enabled on the entire dev wiki, I think it's quite important to have the most prominent bugs fixed asap. --Ohmystars (talk) 13:13, June 19, 2015 (UTC)

It appears to be fixed now, thanks for pointing it out.
As for the protection, I'm not willing to remove it as it opens up a security weakness on any wiki that imports it. If you want to maintain any protected scripts here you're welcome to start contributing original scripts or submitting bugfixes to other scripts, but it's only available for those who are demonstrably experienced enough. cqm 20:26, 19 Jun 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the bug (which was already pointed out by a user two years ago). I understand your reluctance to lower the protection. Next time I'll just notify you again if I see an important bug in a protected script. --Ohmystars (talk) 10:21, June 20, 2015 (UTC)

Your Signature

How do you make the timestamp link to your talk page? Also, is that allowed? I thought there might be a policy against it. Also, it messes up this script.
~Curiouscrab (talk) 14:53, July 16, 2015 (UTC)

It's modified from w:User:Monchoman45/SigReal, it's just based on using #time for the timestamp and using 3 tildes instead of 4 to sign. As far as I'm aware it doesn't violate any policy either on Dev Wiki or Wikia itself.
I'm not going to cater to a third-party script largely because I don't think it's all that useful. It's still perfectly readable, and realistically it's not too far removed from the default timestamp. There are many more variations that can and will do even worse, so I feel it's rather pointless to chase after specific people with the objective of making their sig compatible with a little used script. cqm 15:16, 16 Jul 2015 (UTC)

Admin/Code Editor

Can I be an admin or code editor please? :)

PhilippL(Talk)

I'm unable to hand out admin rights on Dev Wiki, that ability remains with staff. If you'd like to request the codeeditor group, please do so at Dev Wiki:Requests for Codeeditor.
However, the only script you seem to have authored has a syntax error which I spotted at a glance. Unless you have evidence of skill with js on other wikis, I'd suggest learning a little more before requesting the codeeditor group here. It's not something to be handed out like candy. cqm 11:12, 28 Jul 2015 (UTC)

:(=

I am only a JS beginner. :( I can have many questions. Is me the only user that can't write JS? :(

Please help. Me. Throw me out if you like.... :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by PhilippL (talkcontribs)

I realise you are a beginner, but with more experience I'd be happy to give you the codeeditor group. I'd suggest continuing with your codecademy course, and having a go at making your own script elsewhere on wikia to gain that experience. I know it might take a while, but after the recent issues here on dev I'm unable to make any exceptions. cqm 17:18, 30 Jul 2015 (UTC)

Delete

Hi CQM, can you please delete my 'common.js' page and all of my contributions. Cheers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ironindri (talkcontribs)

Hi, I've deleted you common.js, but I'm unable to remove all trace of your contributions. MediaWiki simply doesn't allow it. cqm 06:42, 31 Jul 2015 (UTC)

Delete ToolbarLinks/code.js

The documentation page was already deleted and the code was blanked.
~Curiouscrab (talk) 19:08, July 31, 2015 (UTC)

Done :) cqm 20:20, 31 Jul 2015 (UTC)

JS

Does this work or not????????????

$(".WikiNav .nav").prepend("<div class='custom-dropdown wikia-menu-button'><span>Special Pages</span><ul class='WikiaMenuElement'><li>[[Special:ListUsers|ListUsers]]</li><li>[[Special:LongPages|LongPages]]</li><li>[[Special:ShortPages|ShortPages]]</li><li>[[Special:AllPages|AllPages]]</li><li>[[Special:Random|RandomPage]]</li></ul></div>");—Preceding unsigned comment added by PhilippL (talkcontribs)

It adds the item in for Oasis skin, but it doesn't appear to be in the right location. You might want to try $(".firstChild").prepend("<div class='custom-dropdown wikia-menu-button'><span>Special Pages</span><ul class='WikiaMenuElement'><li>[[Special:ListUsers|ListUsers]]</li><li>[[Special:LongPages|LongPages]]</li><li>[[Special:ShortPages|ShortPages]]</li><li>[[Special:AllPages|AllPages]]</li><li>[[Special:Random|RandomPage]]</li></ul></div>");
~Curiouscrab (talk) 20:37, August 4, 2015 (UTC)

Teaching/learning in the wiki (e.g.Beginners JS Course, lua)

While I agree with the reason for deleting the script CuriousCrab created, I don't particularly agree with the notion that we can't have teaching or training in this wiki. In fact nor does staff, as evidenced by their comment in this thread:

Once Wikia has rolled out Lua to more wikias to test and gather data on and are then prepared to available to all our communities, we will also do some dedicated training time through DEV Wiki chat as well as possibly through webinars. The general training plan has not yet been really mapped out, so questions you ask during this process and things we see will help us plan the most effective way to teach our userbase.

Also, global modules (not hacks) are stored here. In fact, the description of the wiki [1] itself doesn't even make a single mention about documentation:

Welcome to the Wikia Developers Open Source Wiki! This wiki is a place where you can write a new feature, suggest a feature, enhance existing codes, test codes, and collaborate with fellow developers. Do you love to code? Want to contribute to the community and help out with new features? Then volunteer with Wikia Open Source!

This clearly highlights the point I made earlier that collaboration (e.g. code review) is/was a core principle of the wiki, and it is even part of the description itself. The simple fact is that the community (including admins) have failed to create a cohesive wikia that encourages and promotes collaboration. This has become a silo where users simply dump their "WMDs" and ignore them.

If things have changed and this wikia has simply become a storage for hacks and documentation, then the wikia description as well as front page should clearly note that.Dessamator (talk) 13:53, August 4, 2015 (UTC)

I believe Dev Wiki was originally created by a normal user, but it's since been taken over by staff as a documentation resource. As you might have noticed, there's documentation on Nirvana here and the bare, unfinished bones of documentation for Wikia specific extensions. I'm not sure why the documentation project died quite so spectacularly, but I'd guess it was a simple lack of resources available. The main page is a reference to this time, it actually dates from when Wikia used the most recent version of MediaWiki (back in version 1.16) and suggests Wikia specific code is backported to MediaWiki core. As far as I know, this hasn't been the case for a number of years. The collaboration mentions are from the same period, as is the "Wikia Open Source" 'programme' which is actually an attempt to get 3rd-party contributions to Wikia's code base.
There have been a few attempts to resurrect Dev Wiki as a community, one of which was the VolDev programme - you might notice the user group has extra rights on Dev Wiki. Apparently a more recent initiative are these "dedicated training time[s]", although I suspect they won't come to much. If they do, I'd be pleasantly surprised. I'm sure there are several different reasons as to why there isn't much of a community here, but I doubt it's actually the community's fault in reality. I'm confused why you think the admins here are partially to blame as well - I only asked to become an admin here because I noticed codeeditor requests starting to back up and Grunny didn't have much time to deal with them. Community fostering wasn't ever really part of it.
You seem to have taken my comments about hacks a bit out of context. When I think of a code repository, a wiki is not one that comes to mind. It simply was never designed to be one and will likely never cope with being such until someone comes up with a new method to tackle the number of issues. Thus what we've ended up with is a wiki that's been shoehorned into being a code repository, thus "hacks". cqm 16:21, 4 Aug 2015 (UTC)
Well, I do agree a wiki is ill-suited to become a code repository, and frankly it won't ever become one, until either mediawiki or wikia decides to re-engineer part of it, although that'd likely be a waste of time considering the existing tools.  Still, as long as this is used as a place to store and retrieve global modules there needs to be some sense of structure and fostering of newcomers.
Ultimately that's up to the community, my guess is that it won't really affect wikia that much considering that they've managed to survive and profit by simply using regular wikitext/extensions and parser-functions.
Anyway, it would be nice if the front page and other parts were  updated to make it clear what this wiki is currently for so other people don't misunderstand it and create more "unnecessary" threads or pages.
Dessamator (talk) 18:18, August 4, 2015 (UTC)
I definitely agree the front page could use a redesign, so I've submitted a request on community central in the hope of achieving that.
As far as the code repo notion goes, I'm interested to see how wikimedia handles it with global gadgets which we could perhaps re-implment here on wikia. cqm 20:24, 4 Aug 2015 (UTC)
Great we'll see how that goes. I don't think they'll be against the request since this is one of the staff maintained wikis. The bit about categorization would be a problem, adding categories using the user interface causes script errors (I learnt that the hard way). Personally, I think that part of the interface should be hidden for pages with a .js /.css extension, much like it is hidden for module pages.
Wikimedia seems to be moving towards a more wikia like software, they've created a single login for all users, they are planning to store help pages in a single repository, and gadgets have already been enabled I think.
Dessamator (talk) 10:17, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

Beginner course

While I agree that this isn't really the place for learning the basics, it may be helpful to have a "beginners" page that contains links to "official" resources, professional documentation, wiki-related info (mw API / Wikia github), etc. One thing that's always bugged me about learning new things is when people say "there's tons of resources about this already", but then never finding one of these create resources until months later after I've already figured out the basics with needless buckets of tears. So this would keep the dev wiki as it is, but allow newcomers a resource to look at. Fewfre 🔎 K17:51 Tue, 04 Aug 2015

That's a good point. Even a professional coder wouldn't necessarily understand everything about mediawiki and how to create an extension or other things. But ultimately if this wiki's focus is mainly documentation, we can't really fault wikia staff for keeping it as is. Perhaps another wikia needs to be created for those purposes. Dessamator (talk) 18:15, August 4, 2015 (UTC)
That's definitely a good idea. Did you have any ideas about the specifics? cqm 20:37, 4 Aug 2015 (UTC)
I think code.wikia.com would be a perfect host for tutorials, but right now it has it's own community there and none of the admins are admins here. It also appears that they are associated with the Software Wiki which seems to me a duplicate of this one.
~Curiouscrab (talk) 20:53, August 4, 2015 (UTC)
From further inspection, there is already a series of wikis created as courses, but are lacking quite a bit.
~Curiouscrab (talk) 20:56, August 4, 2015 (UTC)
I don't see any reason we can't have links to relevant resources here. mediawiki.org has them iirc, why not us? cqm 21:01, 4 Aug 2015 (UTC)
Right now, the material on the partner wikis of the Programming Wiki (code.wikia.com) is very shallow and uninformative. I think we would have to help work on the wikis before we go out and endorse them by linking to them.
~Curiouscrab (talk) 00:17, August 5, 2015 (UTC)
What about using the existing resources, e.g. MDN, Webplatform or w3schools (the first 2 are actually wikis)? As for online courses there's Codecademy and Khan Academy. I'm sure there'll will be something on Wikibooks as well. There's no need to create something that huge on Wikia from scratch :)
I still use MDN if I ever need to look something up, and for when I get stuck stackoverflow is quite possible the best resource there is. Unfortunately, the biggest part of googling you're problem is knowing what to search for. cqm 07:09, 5 Aug 2015 (UTC)
Yes it is a what I like to call a vicious cycle. People struggle to find documentation to help them learn a new thing, and once they do, they start telling other people that there are many resources for that, instead of creating such documentation for themselves. 
After you've gotten through the hurdle of learning, it is really hard to look back and think as a beginner and what the beginner would need to learn. 
Anyway, I think a portal page for "Coders/Scripts/Programmers" would be good enough. Then we could cover the most commonly used mw.API along with some examples, and links back to mediawiki and other applicable resources. It wouldn't be hard to do a daabase dump, and collate frequently used MW api calls in scripts here. Then simply create examples for how to use those.
 One approach I've used was to create Lua templating/Tips and Tricks, now it is a good enough resource that I sometimes refer back to when I forget syntax or something. 
Revamping the Project namespace would also be good. It still lists old users as admins, and probably contains a lot of other inaccurate data.
Dessamator (talk) 10:29, August 5, 2015 (UTC)
I agree with Dessamator, but with Cqm's post when I was a beginner learning I found that things like Codeacademy and Khan Academy were very fast-paced and uninformative. I didn't learn/retain anything and wasn't set up for real world situations. As for resources rather than courses, those are good for realtime coding, not learning.
~Curiouscrab (talk) 20:52, August 5, 2015 (UTC)
I think it is less a problem of being fast paced and more a problem of people wanting to implement what they learn immediately. It takes considerable time before you can actually apply in real life the things you've learnt. More importantly, courses like codeacademy seem to largely ignore the theory and jump to practice immediately,  so that gets people interested but at the same time leaves a big whole in their knowledge.
People also don't follow the Code academy course structure and jump immediately into js or jquery, long before touching those users need to have a solid understanding of html.
As far as resources vs courses go. A wiki is a resource by definition, it is not designed to be a course, so as CQM said before that's beyond the scope of any wiki even this one. Trying to use technical resources without background knowledge is like trying to construct a building using only manuals and information found in a library or store.
Anyway, I think that rather than discuss it endlessly, the better thing is to actually create mockups of the relevant pages. Theorycrafting doesn't tend to get people anywhere.
Dessamator (talk) 10:34, August 6, 2015 (UTC)

Tables

What are these tables for? It appears that JSharp created a ton of them, but gave no description as to their purpose.
~Curiouscrab (talk) 22:36, August 7, 2015 (UTC)

It's SQL code for creating tables in the database. I spotted them a while back, but never got around to checking whether they were valid on mediawiki/wikia installations. Unfortunately, I know next to no SQL beyond a vague grasp of what it's meant to do and understand a few relevant xkcd's so I'm unable to help much more :) cqm 07:21, 8 Aug 2015 (UTC)
There's nothing special about it. I understand SQL quite well. It is simply creating a table (for comments in that specific case) and setting the primary and secondary keys , as well as the fields/columns in the table.
Dessamator (talk) 08:43, August 8, 2015 (UTC)

Admin Protect Module:Demo for testing only

Hi, I've created module:demo just for testing global modules. This can be used to showcase global modules in certain pages around wikis as a proof of concept, so it shouldn't be changed even by code-editors. Feel free to review the code.

I know there's a similar module called shared test, but that module seems to have been created for different purposes. My suggestion is that it be protected so that only admins and above can possibly change it.

Dessamator (talk) 10:29, August 9, 2015 (UTC)

Main page redesign

Hi Cqm.

As you acknowledged in your request, Dev Wiki, by its unique nature, will never meet the best practices criteria. That said, I fully agree that the main page can be improved, so I'm willing to help with that. :)

Because Dev Wiki's content is so different, I'm kind of at a loss about where to start. I saw that you mentioned a few ideas, so when you have time, please elaborate with any more specific information you have, and I'll get started on helping with the redesign next week.

Enjoy your weekend! JoePlay WikiaStaff2.png (talk) 17:03, August 14, 2015 (UTC)

Forgot to mention this: When doing main page redesigns, it's common for me to import a Google Font to use on section headings. Perhaps there is a font there that would work well here? If you feel like browsing them and find one, let me know. JoePlay WikiaStaff2.png (talk) 17:07, August 14, 2015 (UTC)
To be completely honest, I'm at a loss as well. Everything in the left hand column is years out of date. If this could be turned into documentation for wikia specific code then it would be much easier, but all initiatives to do so have unfortunately failed. Is it worth liaising with any devs to see if creating such documentation here is on the cards? If so, inspiration could be taken from parts of mediawiki.org's main page.
Otherwise, I'd look at taking inspiration from the local wiki nav. If the nav could be expanded into prose/lists I think it would go a long way to addressing the issues. Sections for JS and Lua could include popular examples of user created code, I imagine for the former you've likely spotted a few common scripts in use?
I'm not a huge fan of importing a font on every page that's only used on one page, especially as @import isn't very performant. However, if you had anything suitable in mind feel free to try it :) cqm 06:57, 15 Aug 2015 (UTC)

Updating a script

Hi Cqm,
Since the dev wiki now requires the codeeditor group in order to edit any of the pages, is it possible to ask wikia to turn off the script blocking in here? I've been trying to update this script, but it seems like wikia is blocking it as well- probably because of the .js suffix.
Penguin-Pal (talk) 19:48, August 14, 2015 (UTC)

They've blocked every .js page across Wikia afaik, it's likely a response to the ability to import user scripts into site-wide js and/or scripts here on dev wiki. I don't have the ability to get staff to unblock it here, and to be honest I have concerns about it as well. For example, what if someone gained access to my account and altered AjaxRC? It would hit huge amounts of users and the issues last weekend would seem like a dream rather than the nightmare it's being percieved as so far.
For the time being all I can suggest is copying the script to your computer and saving any changes there until it's unlocked. It's not an ideal solution admittedly, but coding in a code editor is a good practice to get into anyway :) cqm 20:52, 14 Aug 2015 (UTC)
okie, ty 20px-Patrick_Star.svg.png
Penguin-Pal (talk) 04:57, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

codeeditor

Due to the recent changes on the dev wiki, I can no longer edit my ArchiveBoards code files. How does one become a "code editor" so they can edit their own scripts? Since I do not check this wiki regularly, please reply on my talkpage so I get the notification, thanks. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | Tabber Code | Channel 10:21, August 16, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Looking into it, I don't see the point as I don't edit anyone else's scripts (last time I did edit another's script was a year or so ago). The developers wiki should look into making it so that a code page can only be edited by the user who created the page (revision 1 in any page), codeeditors and sysops. Code editor should only really be for people who display a need to edit other people's code files imo (users like UltimateSupreme for example), but it's not my wiki so I can't change established hierarchy with the user groups here. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | Tabber Code | Channel 11:29, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Protect Template:Infobox JavaScript

Currently the above template is unprotected and can be edited by just about anybody. This is a serious issue.
~Curiouscrab (talk) 09:58, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Why is it a serious issue? You haven't explained your reasoning at all.
I can either protect it to sysop level, in which case I'm the only person who's realistically going to edit it, or to codeeditor, which as it happens prevents the last person to edit it from maintaining it if they so choose. cqm 10:05, 24 Aug 2015 (UTC)
It's an issue because with all the breaches recently a hacker could alter one of this wiki's most important templates. It shouldn't be able to be edited by all, so at least a codeeditor protection is needed. Really, though, it should be sysop because nobody should edit it without community and sysop consent.
~Curiouscrab (talk) 22:53, August 24, 2015 (UTC)
You may have noticed Dev Wiki is a little messy when it comes to templates, so I'm trying to keep the barrier to doing that meta-type work as low as possible for someone to come along and help out whenever they notice an issue. A hacker altering the template is a pretty non issue as wikitext is inherently more secure that JS (and I sincerely hope PortableInfoboxes are following the standard security practices of whitelisting attributes and escaping user input where it's output directly).
I don't feel requiring codeeditor is suitable, as templates are outside the scope of a group that was created to maintain JS and CSS in a safe environment. And ultimately, the mainpage is unprotected as well with no vandalism made to it whatsoever in my memory. If vandalism does become an issue, I'll look at reconsidering, but for now I don't think it's worth the increase in that editing barrier. cqm 09:35, 25 Aug 2015 (UTC)
Alright. I don't know if you noticed, but recently somebody made a change without public consent (don't know if they spoke with you or not) and was worried if people were doing that it could get out of hand. Also, I saw you had to request to make edits to the main page so I assumed it must be protected, not knowing that it's actually open to all who can edit.
~Curiouscrab (talk) 20:44, August 25, 2015 (UTC)

Updating script

Can you pull the code from this to this please?

$ npm install shining-armor#

Unfortunately, editing the JS here is still locked down, even to me.
In the interest of code review however, on L187 you can replace typeof _configuration === 'undefined' with the shorter _configuration === undefined (which linters don't get upset about). If you're concerned about undefined getting defined somewhere accidentally, you can add it to your IIFE, e.g. ;(function(window, $, mw, undefined) { It all looks good otherwise :) cqm 07:17, 26 Aug 2015 (UTC)
I was under the impression that you could edit JS but oh well ;~;
As for typeof why do linters not like this? I was under the impression that this was a pretty standard way of checking types.
$ npm install shining-armor# 21:15, August 26, 2015 (UTC)
It works, but using typeof won't throw an error if the variable hasn't been declared. It's a pretty minor difference, but as all variables in JS should be defined before use it might help with debugging if you make a spelling mistake somewhere (if strict mode hasn't caught it already).
Also, codeeditors should be able to edit code.js pages again now, I'm told the lockdown was lifted a hour or so ago :) cqm 21:36, 26 Aug 2015 (UTC)

Code Editing

Can non-code editors no longer create .js pages either? Because I'm still getting this error message when trying to create a new /code.js page: "You can not perform this action right now. Please try again in a few minutes, or contact Wikia if you're having difficulties." (Waiting a few minutes is no solution by the way, because the message has been there since JS got locked.) Is this normal if you're not a code editor? Vogel100 (talk) 08:21, August 27, 2015 (UTC)

Yes, unfortunately it is intended behaviour for the time being as JS is locked down with the editinterfacetrusted right, rather than the codeeditor right. You can request codeeditor rights at Dev Wiki:Requests for Codeeditor, and link an example script (more is better) you've made next to your request.
I'm not sure what the long term solution is, but hopefully it's something Dev Wiki can migrate to with relative ease. cqm 07:01, 28 Aug 2015 (UTC)

FixSourcePages

A while ago I created a script called FixSourcePages which, well, fixed source pages that didn't appear properly. I was wondering if you'd like to look into it and possibly use it here. This would allow for the removal of the first and last lines of just about every script on this wiki.
~Curiouscrab (talk) 20:50, August 30, 2015 (UTC)

It's poorly documented for anyone who isn't aware of what it does and it's bloated in terms of code. Until I know exactly what it does beyond the ambiguous description of "fixes source pages", I'm going to have to decline I'm afraid. cqm 16:36, 31 Aug 2015 (UTC)
I improved the description and I'm not sure what to do about the code. I also reduced the code as best as I could. I'm trying to make sure it still works for both JS and CSS and hopefully I will add Lua modules in the near future.
~Curiouscrab (talk) 02:19, September 1, 2015 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki